A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out amongst future neighbours in excess of the construction of the wall in a coastal internet site in a very north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national focus subsequent an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family members home at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions post about René Collier as well as the Irish Situations post about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has developed right into a hugely publicised authorized struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around construction performs at the positioning on Dublin Highway, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a business director respectively, request to construct their family members household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, exactly where growth pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of established inhabitants. According to the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their possible neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted underneath preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those residents of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their setting up permission by developing a wall further than the boundaries of their web page, leading to an encroachment on the Specific Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, therefore regions are subject to strict controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Of their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments might have lasting ecological consequences, specially inside a delicate coastal ecosystem such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partly developed, is in the correct placement. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful development. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding so as to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal arranging disputes, in which sights of The ocean are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular efforts with the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced inside the Irish Instances. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Times, a picture which includes because turn out to be emblematic from the depth of the dispute. These actions weren't basically symbolic; they have been meant to Collect visual proof in the wall’s posture relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how the two Adult males entered the drinking water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm water to photograph the positioning grew to become Among the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely observed that these kinds of actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a place impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included in detail via the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the background and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard additional submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the authorized timeline.
On the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes over and above what was accredited and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has become referred to as meticulous in his examination of setting up paperwork, maps, and disorders connected for the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is determined by Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm water to photograph the site concern for environmental security and adherence to scheduling legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting as an alternative that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a few simply looking to build a household home in accordance Along with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective happen to be completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted plans. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, like coming into The ocean through a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as more and more common. As sea levels rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments short article about René Collier noted the businessman had Beforehand been involved with regional advocacy on arranging and environmental challenges, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Instances write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous Using the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waist-superior water all through a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Instances and René Collier waded by means of waist-superior drinking water all through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily truth of the coastline along with the symbolic character from the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an abnormal technique.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result stays uncertain. The court should figure out if the wall as built complies with organizing permission and irrespective of whether any encroachment right into a Particular Region of Conservation has happened. The lawful arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and scheduling conditions. Still the human component stays central: neighbours who must live along with one another lengthy following the authorized expenses happen to be paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building functions at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the case lengthen outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. It also underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns such as environmental safety and property legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand remains a location of natural elegance and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre from the dispute stands partly designed, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken off, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely keep on to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Probably the most carefully viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.