A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between future neighbours about the construction of a wall at a coastal web page within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes captivated national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and prolonged-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier along with the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, seek to build their loved ones house. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever progress pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted below scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning permission by developing a wall over and above the boundaries in their web-site, resulting in an encroachment over a Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as such spots are subject matter to rigid controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological consequences, notably inside of a sensitive coastal setting such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, which can be partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of seeking to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, the place sights of the sea are the two very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-higher water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Occasions, a picture which has considering that grow to be emblematic from the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 men entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the location became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances posting about accountant Paul Feely mentioned that these types of actions have been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a location afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument that the SAC was getting encroached on.
The situations at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately because of the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Occasions January 27 2026 became broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important moment within the legal timeline.
At the core of the dispute is a disagreement over boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as constructed, goes beyond what was approved and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and situations attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by worry for environmental defense and adherence to preparing law. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving a private perspective, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm Rene Collier and Paul Feely as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple only attempting to produce a family members household in accordance Using the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works have already been completed dependant on Expert suggestions and permitted designs. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for a situation that numerous observers see as increasingly common. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between non-public land, general public foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming additional contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced previously been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental concerns, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, have become synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning within the sea Irish Moments protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-high drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting the two the Actual physical truth of the coastline as well as the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings go on, the result continues to be unsure. The courtroom have to ascertain if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building works at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that address. For planners, developers, and people alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the value of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal enhancement. Furthermore, it underscores how rapidly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential concerns such as environmental safety and residence rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially developed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved lawful questions. No matter whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, eliminated, or concluded as prepared will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to Among the most intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin lately.